December 19, 2019
One of the few things that people can agree on at a time of so much fractious debate is that our society faces numerous major challenges. Climate change, health and social care, education, public welfare, housing, the criminal justice system and the world of work in general all seem to be under constant threat. “We’re doomed” It’s difficult at times not to hear the voice of Corporal Fraser from the much-loved sitcom, Dad’s Army.
In a continuous search for innovative solutions everyone has their favourite approach.
For many, the key is the private sector existing in a free and unregulated market, where individuals left to their own devices – i.e. once government gets out of the way – will naturally find the best answers.
Others argue that at such a time of crisis, only government, the public sector, has the resources and value system to be trusted to make the key decisions needed
Finally, many people still focus on the role of not-for-profits to fill the gaps left by the limitations of both the market and the state.
So, three sectors of our economy are fighting their corner. All offer something of merit, yet all too often with something in their DNA that inhibits the critical mass and quality of innovation that’s essential to create the solutions so desperately needed in the gaps these sectors don’t serve.
Meanwhile, sharing attributes of each of its bigger three siblings and sitting slightly outside the debate with its nose pressed against the window, is an alternative that offers a vital and vibrant additional ingredient to the debate. A place where the enterprise of business mixes with the sense of service of government and the compassion of not-for-profits to create an exciting space where innovation for substantial social good can truly thrive.
Called variously the Social Enterprise, Social Business, Profit with Purpose, Beyond Profit or Impact-Led Business sector, however, it is an approach that suffers from what can at times be best described as a crippling identity crisis. A crisis that we believe ultimately limits its ambition. A crisis that it needs to address.
That’s why we believe it’s time to start talking clearly, coherently and consistently about a 4th Sector but crucially one that is defined more by the attitude and intent of its leaders and their organisations as any legal definition or structure.
As Karen Lynch, Chief Executive of BELU Water, summed up so well when we interviewed her recently,
“…..the joining together of people around positive intent. Every problem can be an opportunity. Rather than telling people they are bad, we align people around the good that can happen.”
A simple question, but when was the last time you gave yourself permission and a little bit of time to consider the answer? If you can’t remember that’s not a good sign as for any individual consistently meeting these needs is fundamental to positive mental health and for any leader...
‘The organisations we create are a pure reflection of their leaders – their vision, their strengths, their character but also their fears, insecurities, and ego.’ – Ben Lane, Acumen Academy UK When we started writing our book, 4th Sector Entrepreneurship: How to grow sustainable, social impact…without losing your mind...
In our last blog we encouraged people to consider whether their work was not just meeting their specific passion for social justice but also whether it was enabling them to fulfil the lifestyle they wanted. Obviously closely tied to lifestyle is the having to answer the question...